Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 5.1, 5.0 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-10-15 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.27 x 3.27 x 0.40 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Blue and White | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1019.00 | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 490 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3220mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 330 hours standby time 24 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 is just a bit better than Google Nexus 6, with a score of 85.5 against 81.1. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A51 has a newer 11 version and Google Nexus 6 has Android 5.1, providing you a couple nice extra features. Galaxy A51's design is extremely newer, a lot thinner and just a little bit lighter than the Google Nexus 6.
Google Nexus 6 counts with a much better looking display than Galaxy A51, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a bit more pixels per inch in the screen. Google Nexus 6 has a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A51, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with an additional graphics processing unit.
Galaxy A51 captures much clearer videos and photos than Google Nexus 6, and although they both have the same aperture, the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy A51 also has a lot more MP back facing camera. The Galaxy A51 counts with a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than Google Nexus 6, because it has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB and more internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with greater battery performance than Google Nexus 6, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3220mAh.
In addition to being the best phone in our current comparison, Galaxy A51 is also a lot cheaper, which makes it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.