Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 5.1, 5.0 | -- |
| 2014-10-15 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.27 x 3.27 x 0.40 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Blue and White | -- |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1019.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 490 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3220mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 330 hours standby time 24 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 has a general score of 90.7, which is much better than Google Nexus 6's global score of 81.1. The Samsung Galaxy A52 construction is notably newer and somewhat thinner, but also a little bit heavier than the Google Nexus 6. The Google Nexus 6 features a brighter screen than Galaxy A52, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit better quantity of pixels per screen inch and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels.
Samsung Galaxy A52 has a very superior storage to install games and applications than Google Nexus 6, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Google Nexus 6 features a bit better CPU than Galaxy A52, because although it has less processing cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with an additional graphics co-processor.
The Galaxy A52 has a much better battery lifetime than Google Nexus 6, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity. Galaxy A52 shoots greater photos and videos than Google Nexus 6, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy A52 also has a lot higher 64 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera and a bigger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.