Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 5.1, 5.0 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2014-10-15 | 2019-02-05 |
| 6.27 x 3.27 x 0.40 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Blue and White | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1019.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 490 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.54 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 12.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3220mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 330 hours standby time 24 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Nexus 6 has a general score of 81.1, which is slightly better than the Galaxy M20's 78.9 general score. These phones come with Android operating system, but Google Nexus 6 has older 5.1 version while Galaxy M20 has Android 10 version. Google Nexus 6's design is a little bit lighter than Galaxy M20, but it is thicker and was released many years before.
Google Nexus 6 counts with a little better performance than Galaxy M20, because although it has 4 lesser cores (but faster) and less RAM, it also counts with a graphics processor. The Google Nexus 6 features a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a just a bit greater display density.
The Google Nexus 6 features a bit better camera than Galaxy M20, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same resolution back-facing camera, the Google Nexus 6 also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video definition. Samsung Galaxy M20 features much more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Nexus 6, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy M20 also has a SD extension slot that holds up to 512 GB.
The Galaxy M20 has a very superior battery duration than Google Nexus 6, because it has a 55 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.