Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 5.1, 5.0 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2014-10-15 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.27 x 3.27 x 0.40 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Blue and White | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1019.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 490 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3220mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 330 hours standby time 24 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot better than the Google Nexus 6, getting a global score of 98.9 against 81.1. Both devices in this comparison come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has newer 13 version while Google Nexus 6 has Android 5.1, giving you a lot of extra features. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's design is notably newer and incredibly thinner than Google Nexus 6's, but it is somewhat heavier.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a little faster CPU than Google Nexus 6, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with 9 GB more RAM memory and a greater number of cores. Google Nexus 6 has a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, although it has a just a little lower display density, a quite smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a much better camera than Google Nexus 6, because it has a much better video quality, a larger aperture to take better photography and videos in low-light environments and a back camera with a much higher 108 mega-pixels resolution. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has much more storage for games and applications than Google Nexus 6, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1000 GB and more internal memory.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a very superior battery life than Google Nexus 6, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra costs more money than Google Nexus 6, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.