Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 5.1, 5.0 | -- |
| 2014-10-15 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.27 x 3.27 x 0.40 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Blue and White | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1019.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 490 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.54 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3220mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 330 hours standby time 24 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Nexus 6 has a global score of 81.1, which is just a bit better than Galaxy Note7's 79.5 score. Despite being the best phone we are comparing here, Google Nexus 6's construction is older, a little heavier and a lot thicker than Galaxy Note7. Google Nexus 6 counts with a little faster CPU than Galaxy Note7, because although it has lesser RAM memory, and they both have a Quad-Core CPU, the Google Nexus 6 also counts with an extra graphics processor.
Google Nexus 6 features just a bit better looking display than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a bit worse amount of pixels per inch in the display, and they both have the same exact 2560 x 1440 resolution, the Google Nexus 6 also counts with a little bit bigger screen. The Galaxy Note7 shoots slightly better photos and videos than Google Nexus 6, because although it has a lesser mega-pixels camera in the back and a lower 3840x2160 video quality, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to capture better captures in low light situations.
The Galaxy Note7 counts with a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Google Nexus 6, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy Note7 also has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 256 GB. The Galaxy Note7 counts with a little better battery duration than Google Nexus 6, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity against 3220mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.