Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 5.1, 5.0 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2014-10-15 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.27 x 3.27 x 0.40 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Blue and White | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1019.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 490 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3220mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 330 hours standby time 24 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a score of 95.4, which is much better than Google Nexus 6's overall score of 81.1. Although the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is heavier than the Google Nexus 6, it's thinner and also incredibly newer. Both devices we compare here come with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has newer 13 version while Google Nexus 6 has Android 5.1, so it provides the user lots of additional features and increased performance.
Google Nexus 6 features a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has a lower number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a graphics co-processor. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a bit better screen than Google Nexus 6, because it has a little bit more pixels per inch in the screen, a quite bigger screen and a slightly better 1440 x 3088 resolution.
Galaxy S22 Ultra shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Google Nexus 6, because it has a bigger camera aperture, a lot higher video definition and a back facing camera with a much better resolution. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much greater storage to store more games and applications than Google Nexus 6, because it has 128 GB internal storage.
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a superior battery performance than Google Nexus 6, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is more expensive than the Google Nexus 6, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.