Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 5.1, 5.0 | Android 14 |
| 2014-10-15 | -- |
| 6.27 x 3.27 x 0.40 inches | -- |
| 6.49 ounces | -- |
| Blue and White | -- |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1019.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 490 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.54 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3220mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 330 hours standby time 24 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 is a little bit better than the Google Nexus 6, having an 82.6 score against 81.1. Galaxy S25's design is noticeably lighter and extremely thinner than the Google Nexus 6. Both of these devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S25 has a newer 14 version while Google Nexus 6 has Android 5.1, so it offers some additional features and optimized performance.
The Google Nexus 6 has an extremely better CPU than Galaxy S25, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a graphics processing unit. Galaxy S25 features just a bit better looking display than Google Nexus 6, because although it has a just a little lower pixels density and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a quite larger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 counts with a way bigger memory to store more apps and games than Google Nexus 6, because it has 64 GB more internal storage. Samsung Galaxy S25 features superior battery duration than Google Nexus 6, because it has a 24% more battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy S25 counts with a way better camera than Google Nexus 6, because it has a bigger aperture to take better photography and videos in poorly lited situations, a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a back-facing camera with lot more MP.
Galaxy S25 not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.