Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 5.1, 5.0 | Android 14 |
| 2014-10-15 | -- |
| 6.27 x 3.27 x 0.40 inches | -- |
| 6.49 ounces | -- |
| Blue and White | -- |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1019.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 490 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.54 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3220mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 330 hours standby time 24 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra is much better than the Google Nexus 6, getting a overall score of 90.7 against 81.1. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS, but Galaxy S25 Ultra has a newer 14 version and Google Nexus 6 has Android 5.1, so it gives a lot of extra features and a performance increase. Galaxy S25 Ultra's construction is extremely thinner and extremely lighter than Google Nexus 6.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much better looking display than Google Nexus 6, because it has a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 3088, a little larger display and a bit more pixels per screen inch. The Google Nexus 6 has a much better performing CPU than Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has a lower number of cores (although they are faster) and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a way bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Nexus 6, because it has more internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much longer battery performance than Google Nexus 6, because it has a 55 percent greater battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a way better camera than Google Nexus 6, because it has a back facing camera with much more mega-pixels, a bigger aperture to capture better low light photos and video and a much better 7680x4320 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.