Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 5.1, 5.0 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-10-15 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.27 x 3.27 x 0.40 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Blue and White | Black |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1019.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 490 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3220mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 330 hours standby time 24 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Nexus 6 has an overall score of 81.1, which is slightly better than the Galaxy XCover Pro's 81 global score. Despite of the fact the Google Nexus 6 is much older and just a little thicker than the Galaxy XCover Pro, it's body is still lighter. These devices have Android OS (operating system), but the Google Nexus 6 has the older 5.1 version and Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11 version.
Google Nexus 6 counts with a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and lesser cores , it also counts with an extra GPU. The Google Nexus 6 has a brighter screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a little better pixel quantity in each inch of display.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a slightly better camera than Google Nexus 6, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has a much more megapixels back-facing camera and a bigger aperture. The Galaxy XCover Pro has a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Nexus 6, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with improved battery duration than Google Nexus 6, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity.
Although Google Nexus 6 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, giving up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.