Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 5.1, 5.0 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2014-10-15 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.27 x 3.27 x 0.40 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue and White | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1019.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 490 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3220mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 330 hours standby time 24 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip has a general score of 88.5, which is just a bit better than Google Nexus 6's 81.1 score. Both phones we are comparing use Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Flip has 12 version while Google Nexus 6 has Android 5.1. Galaxy Z Flip is a newer cellphone, and it is also notably thinner and just a bit lighter than Google Nexus 6.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a bit superior processor than Google Nexus 6, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, it also counts with 5 GB more RAM memory and a larger number of faster cores. Google Nexus 6 features just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher 2560 x 1440px resolution and a just a little better pixel quantity in each inch in the display.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a slightly better camera than Google Nexus 6, because although it has a camera in the back with less mega-pixels and a lower (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to capture better low light photos and video. Galaxy Z Flip has a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Google Nexus 6, because it has 256 GB internal storage.
Galaxy Z Flip features just a bit better battery lifetime than Google Nexus 6, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 3220mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is more expensive than Google Nexus 6, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.