Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.1 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | |
| Android 5.1, 5.0 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2014-10-15 | 2020-02-07 |
| 6.27 x 3.27 x 0.40 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.49 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Blue and White | Black, Ochre and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1019.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 490 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 11.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3220mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 330 hours standby time 24 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Nexus 6 is a little bit better than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, getting a global score of 81.1 against 76.6. The Google Nexus 6 is a better phone than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, we must tell that it is also a noticeably older, way thicker and a little heavier phone. Both phones in this review include Android OS, but Google Nexus 6 has an older 5.1 version and ZTE Axon 10s Pro has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Google Nexus 6 counts with a much better looking screen than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440px resolution and a little bit greater pixel amount per inch of display. The ZTE Axon 10s Pro has a bit better processor than Google Nexus 6, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM and a higher number of cores.
The ZTE Axon 10s Pro takes clearer pictures and videos than Google Nexus 6, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video quality, the ZTE Axon 10s Pro also has a way more megapixels camera in the back and a larger diafragm aperture to take better photos and video in low light environments.
ZTE Axon 10s Pro has much more storage for applications and games than Google Nexus 6, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1000 GB and more internal memory capacity. The ZTE Axon 10s Pro counts with greater battery life than Google Nexus 6, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.