Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 15 | -- |
| -- | 2020-05-15 |
| -- | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.35 ounces |
| Obsidian and Porcelain | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| -- | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| -- | 395 pixels per inch |
| 2700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 4.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Google Tensor G5 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4650mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet is much better than the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), getting a global score of 87.1 against 76.7. LG Velvet features a lot better screen than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has a quite smaller screen. The LG Velvet has a very superior processing unit than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has less RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
LG Velvet captures better photos and videos than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has slower video frame rate, they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a same resolution back facing camera. The LG Velvet has a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored) has just a bit better battery duration than LG Velvet, because it has 4650mAh of battery capacity against 4300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.