Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 15 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2019-12-27 |
| -- | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.07 ounces |
| Obsidian and Porcelain | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 405 pixels per inch |
| 2700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 4.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Google Tensor G5 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4650mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 is much better than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), having an 85.5 score against 76.7. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A51 has the older 11 version while Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored) has Android 15 version. Galaxy A51 counts with a way better looking screen than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has a bit smaller screen.
The Galaxy A51 counts with slightly more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with a much better performing processing unit than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored) has just a little bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has 4650mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh. The Galaxy A51 counts with a much better camera than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has worse 30 fps video frame rates, they both have a back facing camera with a 48 mega pixels resolution and the same 3840x2160 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.