Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 15 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-08-21 |
| -- | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| -- | 7.34 ounces |
| Obsidian and Porcelain | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.9 inches |
| -- | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| -- | 494 pixels per inch |
| 2700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 4.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Google Tensor G5 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4650mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an overall score of 98.9, which is way better than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored)'s 76.7 score. Both devices we are comparing have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has the previous 13 version while Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored) has Android 15 version.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a very superior CPU than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a lot better screen than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has a little bit smaller screen.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a greater camera than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), because it has a much higher 7680x4320 video definition and a way better resolution camera. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored) has just a little bit longer battery duration than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 4650mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.