Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 15 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-03-08 |
| -- | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 5.54 ounces |
| Obsidian and Porcelain | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| -- | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| -- | 551 pixels per inch |
| 2700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 4.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Google Tensor G5 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4650mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 has a general score of 88.3, which is better than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored)'s 76.7 global score. Both of these devices include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S10 has the older 11 version and Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored) has Android 15. Galaxy S10 features a much better hardware performance than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Galaxy S10 counts with a much better screen than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has a way smaller screen. The Galaxy S10 captures clearer pictures and videos than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has a worse video definition and a way less mega pixels resolution camera.
The Galaxy S10 has a little bit more storage to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored) counts with a superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S10, because it has 4650mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.