Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 15 | -- |
| -- | 2019-03-08 |
| -- | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 5.29 ounces |
| Obsidian and Porcelain | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| -- | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| -- | 435 pixels per inch |
| 2700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 4.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Google Tensor G5 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4650mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10e has a score of 86.3, which is much better than the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored)'s global score of 76.7. Galaxy S10e counts with a way better looking display than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has a much smaller screen. The Galaxy S10e has a little bit more storage for applications and games than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S10e has a much more powerful CPU than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy S10e takes slightly better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has a lot lower 12 mega pixels resolution camera and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored) features a much better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has 4650mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.