Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 15 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-03-06 |
| -- | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 5.78 ounces |
| Obsidian and Porcelain | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| -- | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| -- | 566 pixels per inch |
| 2700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 4.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Google Tensor G5 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4650mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 has a score of 94.8, which is a lot better than the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored)'s 76.7 general score. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S20 has older 13 version while Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored) has Android 15 version. Galaxy S20 features a much faster CPU than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has less RAM memory, they both have 8 cores.
Galaxy S20 features a much sharper display than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has a really smaller display. The Galaxy S20 features a quite bigger memory to install games and applications than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 captures a little bit better videos and photos than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has a camera in the back with much less MP, it also counts with a lot higher video resolution. Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored) features a bit superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S20, because it has 4650mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.