Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 15 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-10-02 |
| -- | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 6.70 ounces |
| Obsidian and Porcelain | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| -- | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 405 pixels per inch |
| 2700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 4.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Google Tensor G5 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4650mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a general score of 90.8, which is much better than the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored)'s score of 76.7. Both devices we compare here include Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has an older 11 version while Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored) has Android 15 version.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features a lot better display than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has a little bit smaller screen. The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE features a quite bigger storage for applications and games than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a much greater performance than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has 10 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored) has a bit better battery duration than Galaxy S20 FE, because it has a 3 percent larger battery capacity.
The Galaxy S20 FE shoots a little bit better videos and photos than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has a way worse resolution camera in the back and a lower video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.