Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 15 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-03-06 |
| -- | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.83 ounces |
| Obsidian and Porcelain | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 6.9 inches |
| -- | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| -- | 509 pixels per inch |
| 2700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 4.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Google Tensor G5 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4650mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), having a 98 score against 76.7. Both devices in this review use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the previous 13 version and Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored) has Android 15. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a much greater processing power than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a way better looking screen than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has a quite smaller screen. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a little better battery duration than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G captures a lot better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), because it has a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back and a way better 7680x4320 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.