Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 15 | -- |
| -- | 2016-03-11 |
| -- | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 5.36 ounces |
| Obsidian and Porcelain | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 576 pixels per inch |
| 2700 cd/m2 brightness | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 4.9 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Google Tensor G5 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4650mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 has a general score of 79.5, which is a little bit better than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored)'s global score of 76.7. Samsung Galaxy S7 counts with a way better looking screen than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has a really smaller display and way less brightness.
The Galaxy S7 counts with a much powerful processing unit than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and 4 less processing cores (although faster). The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored) has a very superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored) has a really longer battery life than Galaxy S7, because it has a 55% larger battery capacity. Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored) has a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy S7, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored) also has better 60 fps video frame rate and a back camera with lot more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.