Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.7 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 15 | -- |
| -- | 2017-04-21 |
| -- | 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 5.47 ounces |
| Obsidian and Porcelain | Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 173.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| -- | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 568 pixels per inch |
| 2700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 4.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Google Tensor G5 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4650mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S8 has a global score of 81.7, which is just a bit better than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored)'s 76.7 general score. Samsung Galaxy S8 has a way better hardware performance than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has 12 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S8 features a lot better looking display than Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has a lot smaller display. Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored) counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy S8, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored) also has a way higher resolution back facing camera and higher 60 fps video frame rate.
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored) counts with a much better memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S8, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold (Rumored) counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S8, because it has a 55 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.