Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 15 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-08-21 |
| -- | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| -- | 7.34 ounces |
| -- | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.9 inches |
| -- | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| -- | 494 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Google Tensor G5 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 42.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an overall score of 98.9, which is way better than Google Pixel 10 Pro (Rumored)'s score of 74.9. Both phones in this review come with Android operating system, but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has the older 13 version and Google Pixel 10 Pro (Rumored) has Android 15. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a way better hardware performance than Google Pixel 10 Pro (Rumored), although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a much more vibrant display than Google Pixel 10 Pro (Rumored), because it has a bit bigger display. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a greater camera than Google Pixel 10 Pro (Rumored), because it has a back camera with a way higher 108 mega-pixels resolution and a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Google Pixel 10 Pro (Rumored), and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The Google Pixel 10 Pro (Rumored) has just a bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.