Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 15 | Android 5.1 |
| -- | 2015-08-13 |
| -- | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 6.03 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| -- | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| -- | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 515 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 5 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Google Tensor G5 (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 6.3 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 42.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.56 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 5 is a little bit better than Google Pixel 10 Pro (Rumored), with a 79.3 score against 74.9. These devices include Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has 5.1 version while Google Pixel 10 Pro (Rumored) has Android 15 version. Galaxy Note 5 has a much better looking display than Google Pixel 10 Pro (Rumored), although it has a quite smaller screen.
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 features a much better performing processor than Google Pixel 10 Pro (Rumored), although it has a lower number of cores (although they are faster) and less RAM. Google Pixel 10 Pro (Rumored) features just a bit better camera than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Google Pixel 10 Pro (Rumored) also has a way more MP back-facing camera and higher video frame rates.
The Google Pixel 10 Pro (Rumored) counts with a way bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy Note 5, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Google Pixel 10 Pro (Rumored) has a way better battery duration than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 57 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.