Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 15 | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| -- | 2016-03-11 |
| -- | 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 5.54 ounces |
| -- | Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 336.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 534 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Google Tensor G5 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 42.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S7 edge is slightly better than the Google Pixel 10 Pro (Rumored), with a overall score of 78.1 against 74.9. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS, but the Galaxy S7 edge has 8.0 Oreo version and Google Pixel 10 Pro (Rumored) has Android 15 version, so it gives you a lot of extra features and some performance improvements.
The Galaxy S7 edge features a much sharper display than Google Pixel 10 Pro (Rumored), although it has a quite smaller screen. Samsung Galaxy S7 edge counts with a lot better performance than Google Pixel 10 Pro (Rumored), although it has 12 GB lesser RAM and less processing cores. The Google Pixel 10 Pro (Rumored) features a quite bigger memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Google Pixel 10 Pro (Rumored) counts with a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Google Pixel 10 Pro (Rumored) also has a camera in the back with a way higher 50 mega pixels resolution and better video frame rate.
The Google Pixel 10 Pro (Rumored) has superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity against 3600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.