Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.9 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 15 | -- |
| -- | 2017-04-21 |
| -- | 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 5.47 ounces |
| -- | Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 173.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.8 inches |
| -- | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 568 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Google Tensor G5 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 42.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.56 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S8 has a general score of 81.7, which is a little bit better than Google Pixel 10 Pro (Rumored)'s 74.9 score. Samsung Galaxy S8 has a much better looking screen than Google Pixel 10 Pro (Rumored), although it has a little bit smaller display. The Samsung Galaxy S8 has an extremely better processing unit than Google Pixel 10 Pro (Rumored), although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Samsung Galaxy S8 counts with a little bit better storage capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 10 Pro (Rumored), because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 256 GB. Google Pixel 10 Pro (Rumored) shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy S8, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Google Pixel 10 Pro (Rumored) also has a back facing camera with much more MP and higher video frame rate.
The Google Pixel 10 Pro (Rumored) counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S8, because it has a 57 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.