Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.2 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 15 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-08-21 |
| -- | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| -- | 7.34 ounces |
| -- | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.9 inches |
| -- | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| -- | 494 pixels per inch |
| 2700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 4.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Google Tensor G5 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.50 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot better than Google Pixel 10 (Rumored), having a score of 98.9 against 74.2. Both devices we are comparing here have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an older 13 version while Google Pixel 10 (Rumored) has Android 15. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a very superior processing unit than Google Pixel 10 (Rumored). They have the same number of cores and 12 GB of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a way better looking screen than Google Pixel 10 (Rumored), because it has a quite bigger screen. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures much clearer pictures and videos than Google Pixel 10 (Rumored), because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for shooting pictures and videos in low light situations, it also counts with a back facing camera with much more mega pixels and a way higher 7680x4320 video definition.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 10 (Rumored), and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has an external memory card slot that admits up to 1000 GB.
Google Pixel 10 (Rumored) has a little longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 4700mAh battery size against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.