Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.2 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 15 | -- |
| -- | 2016-03-11 |
| -- | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 5.36 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.1 inches |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| -- | 576 pixels per inch |
| 2700 cd/m2 brightness | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 4.9 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Google Tensor G5 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 10.50 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 is a bit better than Google Pixel 10 (Rumored), getting a 79.5 score against 74.2. The Galaxy S7 counts with a way better looking display than Google Pixel 10 (Rumored), although it has a little smaller screen and much darker display. Google Pixel 10 (Rumored) counts with a better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S7, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy S7 has an extremely better processor than Google Pixel 10 (Rumored), although it has a smaller amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores. The Google Pixel 10 (Rumored) captures much better pictures and videos than Galaxy S7, and although they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture and the same (4K) video definition, the Google Pixel 10 (Rumored) also has a camera in the back with lot more MP and higher 60 frames per second video frame rate.
The Google Pixel 10 (Rumored) counts with a superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a 4700mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.