Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 93.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| -- | iOS 15.x |
| 2017-10-19 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Black and White | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 152.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.52 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 13 Pro is much better than Google Pixel 2 XL, having a overall score of 93.3 against 82.5. The iPhone 13 Pro design is incredibly newer and a bit thinner than the Google Pixel 2 XL's, although it is somewhat heavier. Apple iPhone 13 Pro counts with a better processing power than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a 64-bit processor and a larger amount of RAM.
The iPhone 13 Pro has a little more vivid screen than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a quite lower 1170 x 2532 resolution and a just a bit less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a quite larger screen. The iPhone 13 Pro counts with just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a worse (4K) video resolution and a back-facing camera with a lower resolution, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture.
The Google Pixel 2 XL and the Apple iPhone 13 Pro have incredibly similar memory capacity for apps and games, both of them have the same internal memory. Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a bit better battery performance than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, because it has 3520mAh of battery capacity against 3095mAh.
Although Apple iPhone 13 Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Google Pixel 2 XL, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 2 XL. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Apple iPhone 13 Pro, otherwise you can save some money and get the Google Pixel 2 XL, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.