Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| -- | iOS 15.x |
| 2017-10-19 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Black and White | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 152.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.52 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max has a score of 93.2, which is much better than Google Pixel 2 XL's global score of 82.5. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max is a newer and a bit thinner phone than Google Pixel 2 XL, although it's noticeably heavier. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max features a little bit better looking screen than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a just a bit lower amount of pixels per screen inch and a bit lower 1284 x 2778 resolution, it also counts with a quite bigger display.
The iPhone 13 Pro Max has a better CPU than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with a greater amount of RAM and a 64 bits processor. IPhone 13 Pro Max has as much memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos as the Google Pixel 2 XL one, both of them have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory.
The iPhone 13 Pro Max captures just a bit better videos and photos than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 video definition and a less mega-pixels back facing camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture. The iPhone 13 Pro Max has better battery life than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has a 4352mAh battery size.
Although iPhone 13 Pro Max is a better device, it costs a lot more than Google Pixel 2 XL, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 2 XL. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the iPhone 13 Pro Max, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Google Pixel 2 XL, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.