Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| 2017-10-19 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black and White | Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 152.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.52 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone X has an overall score of 88.1, which is slightly better than Google Pixel 2 XL's score of 82.5. Apple iPhone X's construction is just a little bit thinner and just a bit lighter than Google Pixel 2 XL, even though both were released with only a couple months difference. The Apple iPhone X features a little bit better looking display than Google Pixel 2 XL, although it has a bit lower 1125 x 2436px resolution, a bit smaller screen and a little bit lower pixel density.
IPhone X counts with a bit better processor than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has 2 less processing cores and lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit processor. The iPhone X has a superior storage for applications and games than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has more internal memory capacity.
The Apple iPhone X features a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 2 XL, although it has a tinier back camera sensor which provides a worse photo and video quality, a lower (4K) video quality and a back-facing camera with lesser mega pixels, they both have a F1.8 aperture. Google Pixel 2 XL has superior battery duration than iPhone X, because it has 3520mAh of battery capacity instead of 2716mAh.
Although Apple iPhone X is a better device, it is way more expensive than Google Pixel 2 XL, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel 2 XL. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Apple iPhone X, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Google Pixel 2 XL, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.