Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 92.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2024-03-22 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 8.36 ounces |
| Black and White | Agate Grey and Frozen Berry |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 152.00 | $ 1389.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2800 x 1280 pixels |
| P-OLED | LTPO |
| 537 pixels per inch | 453 pixels per inch |
| -- | 5000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 10.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 24 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 1 TB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 23.2 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.52 | 7.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
Comparison review
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is much better than the Google Pixel 2 XL, with a 92.1 score against 82.5. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is a a lot newer device than Google Pixel 2 XL, but it's thicker and heavier. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features a much sharper display than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a bit worse 1280 x 2800 pixels resolution and a just a bit lower display density, it also counts with a quite larger screen.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a superior storage for applications and games than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has 896 GB more internal storage. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a bit faster processor than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has more RAM.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a much better battery performance than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has a 5600mAh battery capacity. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a way better camera than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has a lot bigger aperture to capture better low-light captures and videos, a much larger camera sensor which offers a much better image and video quality, higher 60 frames per second video frame rate and a camera with a lot higher 50 mega pixels resolution.
Although Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Google Pixel 2 XL, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 2 XL. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy Google Pixel 2 XL, letting go a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.