Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2017-10-19 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 152.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.52 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 XL has an overall score of 82.5, which is a little bit better than LG G7 Fit's overall score of 77. The Google Pixel 2 XL design has the same thickness than the LG G7 Fit, but it is heavier. LG G7 Fit features a sharper screen than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has a little bit higher 1440 x 3120 resolution, a quite bigger display and a just a bit higher pixels quantity in each screen inch.
Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a bit better processing power than LG G7 Fit, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Google Pixel 2 XL also has a greater number of cores (and faster). LG G7 Fit features a camera that's just as good as Google Pixel 2 XL's camera, because although the LG G7 Fit has a smaller aperture and a smaller camera sensor capturing lower quality videos and images, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video quality, it also counts with a back facing camera with a much better 16 MP resolution.
The LG G7 Fit has a much greater memory for apps and games than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Google Pixel 2 XL has superior battery lifetime than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 3520mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.