Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2020-05-07 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black and White | Mirror black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 152.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2310 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 398 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 XL is just a bit better than LG Q70, having an 82.5 score against 77.9. Google Pixel 2 XL's design is a little thinner and somewhat lighter than LG Q70, although it was released many years before. The Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a bit sharper display than LG Q70, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel density and a better 1440 x 2880 resolution.
Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a bit better processing unit than LG Q70. They have a Octa-Core processing unit and a 4 GB RAM. LG Q70 features a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG Q70 has a bit longer battery duration than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3520mAh. The LG Q70 captures just a bit better photos and videos than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor, and they both have the same aperture, the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the LG Q70 also counts with a lot higher resolution back camera.
The Google Pixel 2 XL is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.