Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 5.1 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2015-10-01 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 152.00 | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.7 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 5.52 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 XL is a bit better than LG V10, getting an 82.5 score against 78.6. The Google Pixel 2 XL design is newer, a bit thinner and a bit lighter than LG V10. Google Pixel 2 XL has a better processor than LG V10, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Google Pixel 2 XL also has a larger number of faster cores.
The LG V10 has a bit more vivid display than Google Pixel 2 XL, although it has a little lower resolution of 2560 x 1440px, a little bit smaller screen and a bit inferior quantity of pixels per inch in the display. LG V10 shoots slightly better photos and videos than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have a 0.38 inches back camera sensor, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a F1.8 camera aperture, the LG V10 also has a camera in the back with a lot higher 16 mega pixels resolution and faster video frame rate.
The LG V10 features a superior storage for applications and games than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Google Pixel 2 XL has longer battery duration than LG V10, because it has 3520mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Google Pixel 2 XL is also a bargain compared to the other phones, which makes it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.