Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| 2017-10-19 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 152.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.52 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 XL is a little bit better than the LG V35 ThinQ, having a global score of 82.5 against 81.3. Despite being the best cellphone we are comparing here, we must tell that it is also a just a little thicker and just a little heavier cellphone. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a slightly better display than Google Pixel 2 XL. Both have the same quantity of pixels per inch of display, a screen of the same size and the same exact resolution of 1440 x 2880.
LG V35 ThinQ features a bit superior processor than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG V35 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The LG V35 ThinQ has a lot bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Google Pixel 2 XL features just a bit better battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 3520mAh of battery capacity. LG V35 ThinQ captures clearer photographs and videos than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor giving a worse image quality, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video resolution, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a bigger camera aperture to capture better captures and videos in low light situations and a back facing camera with a much higher 16 mega-pixels resolution.
The Google Pixel 2 XL not only is the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.