Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black and White | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 152.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.52 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 XL is slightly better than the LG V40 ThinQ, with a general score of 82.5 against 81.2. Although it's the best we are comparing here, the Google Pixel 2 XL is an older, just a little bit heavier and just a bit thicker cellphone than LG V40 ThinQ. The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a bit better processor than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has more RAM memory.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with a little sharper screen than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have the same count of pixels in each inch of screen, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a little larger screen and a little bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3120. The LG V40 ThinQ captures a bit better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a worse video resolution and a camera in the back with a worse 12 MP resolution, and they both have the same back-facing camera sensor size, the LG V40 ThinQ also counts with a bigger aperture.
LG V40 ThinQ features a much greater memory capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Google Pixel 2 XL features just a bit longer battery life than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 7% more battery size.
Even being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Google Pixel 2 XL is also by far the cheapest one, which makes it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.