Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Black and White | Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 152.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ has a global score of 87.6, which is a bit better than Google Pixel 2 XL's 82.5 overall score. The LG V60 ThinQ construction is noticeably newer, but way heavier and thicker than Google Pixel 2 XL. The LG V60 ThinQ has a little better performance than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 2 XL has a little sharper display than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher display density and a better 1440 x 2880 resolution. The LG V60 ThinQ has a lot bigger memory to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V60 ThinQ features a much better battery life than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3520mAh. The LG V60 ThinQ captures a little bit better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a way higher video definition, a much larger back camera sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photographs and a back camera with much more mega-pixels.
Although LG V60 ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more than Google Pixel 2 XL, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 2 XL. If you are trying to save some money, you can get Google Pixel 2 XL, giving up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.