Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| Black and White | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 152.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Wing is better than Google Pixel 2 XL, having a 91.2 score against 82.5. Even though LG Wing is notably newer than the Google Pixel 2 XL, it is extremely heavier and way thicker. Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a bit better looking display than LG Wing, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution and a greater display density.
LG Wing features a little faster CPU than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG Wing also has a greater amount of RAM memory. LG Wing has a lot better camera than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same video definition, the LG Wing also has faster video frame rate, a much larger back camera sensor taking lot better quality pictures and videos and a camera in the back with way more MP.
The LG Wing counts with a much better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB and 256 GB internal memory. The LG Wing features just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3520mAh.
Although LG Wing is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Google Pixel 2 XL, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 2 XL. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy Google Pixel 2 XL, giving up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.