Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and White | Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 152.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.52 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 XL is slightly better than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, with an 82.5 score against 78.5. Google Pixel 2 XL's construction is older, a bit heavier and just a little bit thicker than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion. The Google Pixel 2 XL features a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a little more vivid screen than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a way lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little worse pixel density, it also counts with a bit larger screen. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion shoots a lot better photos and videos than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion also has a much better resolution back-facing camera, a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a much bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion's memory to install games and applications is just as good as Google Pixel 2 XL's one, they have the same internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with better battery performance than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has a 25% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.