Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.00 ounces |
| Black and White | Interstellar Black and Starlight White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 152.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1250 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 14.96 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 XL is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, with an 82.5 score against 80.9. The Google Pixel 2 XL construction is a little bit thinner and lighter than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, although it was released 5 years before. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a bit sharper display than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a lot worse pixel density and a lot lower 1080 x 2400px resolution, it also counts with a bit larger screen.
Google Pixel 2 XL features a very superior processing unit than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has lesser RAM, it also counts with 7 more CPU cores. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra captures a lot better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for shooting pictures or video in low-light environments, it also counts with a much higher 7680x4320 video definition, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor and a back facing camera with a much better 200 mega pixels resolution.
Google Pixel 2 XL and Motorola Edge 30 Ultra both have incredibly similar storage to store more games and applications, both of them have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a superior battery performance than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has a 42% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.