Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black and White | Interstellar Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 152.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.52 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 40 Pro is just a bit better than Google Pixel 2 XL, with an 83.4 score against 82.5. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro design is newer than Google Pixel 2 XL's, but it's a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier. The Google Pixel 2 XL features a much powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a bit sharper display than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a way worse amount of pixels per screen inch and a way worse 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a little bigger screen. Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a much greater memory capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro shoots much better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also has a way better 7680x4320 video definition, a back-facing camera with way more MP and a way larger back-facing camera sensor shooting way better quality photographs.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features improved battery performance than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has a 4600mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.