Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black and White | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 152.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.52 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 XL has a score of 82.5, which is slightly better than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo's 81.9 general score. Google Pixel 2 XL's design is a bit thinner than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo, but it's a little bit heavier and was released 7 years before. The Google Pixel 2 XL features a much better performing CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a much better looking display than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1256 x 2760px and a little bit less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a little bit larger screen. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a lot bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo shoots a lot better videos and photos than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have the same video resolution, a F1.8 camera aperture and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a much bigger sensor and a way better 50 mega-pixels resolution camera.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has superior battery life than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has a 4310mAh battery size instead of 3520mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.