Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black and White | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 152.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a bit better than the Google Pixel 2 XL, with a overall score of 87.1 against 82.5. Even though the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is extremely newer than the Google Pixel 2 XL, it is a little thicker and heavier. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much better looking screen than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a lot less pixels per display inch and a way worse 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a bit larger display.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity. The Google Pixel 2 XL features a very superior processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots greater pictures and videos than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a lot larger back camera sensor providing a much better image quality, faster 60 frames per second video frame rate, a bigger aperture and a lot more megapixels back camera.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has better battery performance than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.