Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2020-12-07 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Black and White | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 152.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | LTPS |
| 537 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 XL has a global score of 82.5, which is a bit better than Motorola Moto G 5G's 81.5 general score. The Google Pixel 2 XL construction is somewhat lighter and noticeably thinner than Motorola Moto G 5G, despite of the fact that it was released 3 years before. The Google Pixel 2 XL features a bit faster processor than Motorola Moto G 5G. Both have the same RAM memory amount and 8 cpu cores.
Google Pixel 2 XL features a little more vivid screen than Moto G 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels and a better pixels quantity per inch of display. The Moto G 5G counts with a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that allows up to 1000 GB.
Moto G 5G counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3520mAh. The Motorola Moto G 5G features a superior camera than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Moto G 5G also has a back-facing camera with a much better 48 mega-pixels resolution and a bigger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.