Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2017-10-19 | 2020-07-08 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black and White | Surfing blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 152.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 2 XL, having an 82.6 score against 82.5. Motorola Moto G 5G Plus's design is noticeably newer, but somewhat heavier and thicker than Google Pixel 2 XL. Google Pixel 2 XL and Motorola Moto G 5G Plus have very similar processing units, both of them have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM.
The Google Pixel 2 XL has just a bit better screen than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution and a greater screen density. Moto G 5G Plus features a superior camera than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video definition, the Moto G 5G Plus also has a way bigger back camera sensor taking much better quality photos and videos, a bigger diafragm aperture and a back camera with lot more mega-pixels.
The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus counts with a much better storage capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus has a very superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.