Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black and White | Smoke black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 152.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 XL is slightly better than Moto G Power, having an 82.5 score against 76.1. Google Pixel 2 XL's design is somewhat thinner and lighter than Moto G Power, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. The Google Pixel 2 XL has a bit more powerful processor than Moto G Power. Both of them have a Octa-Core processing unit and 4 GB of RAM memory.
Google Pixel 2 XL features a little more vivid display than Moto G Power, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a better 1440 x 2880 resolution. The Motorola Moto G Power features a greater memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
The Motorola Moto G Power counts with a much longer battery duration than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. The Motorola Moto G Power features a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a smaller sensor, and they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Moto G Power also counts with a larger diafragm aperture and a back facing camera with a way better 16 mega pixels resolution.
Google Pixel 2 XL is a bit more expensive than Moto G Power, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.