Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-10-19 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black and White | Capri blue and Smoke black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 152.00 | $ 237.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 XL is slightly better than Moto G8 Power, getting an 82.5 score against 76. Although Google Pixel 2 XL is much older than Moto G8 Power, it's design is lighter and somewhat thinner. Google Pixel 2 XL features just a bit better screen than Motorola Moto G8 Power, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater display density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels.
The Google Pixel 2 XL features a bit better processing power than Moto G8 Power. Both of them have a Octa-Core processing unit and a 4 GB RAM memory. Moto G8 Power has a bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
The Moto G8 Power counts with a slightly better camera than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor shooting worse quality videos and photographs, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Moto G8 Power also counts with a lot higher resolution back camera and a larger camera aperture to take better photography in low-light environments.
The Motorola Moto G8 Power has a much longer battery performance than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3520mAh.
In addition to being the best phone in our current comparison, the Google Pixel 2 XL is also very cheap compared to the other devices, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.