Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| -- | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2017-10-19 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 152.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.52 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 XL is just a bit better than the Moto Z Force, getting a general score of 82.5 against 75.8. The Google Pixel 2 XL is a newer cellphone than the Moto Z Force, but it's a little bit thicker and just a little heavier. Google Pixel 2 XL features a little more vivid screen than Moto Z Force, because it has a quite better resolution of 1440 x 2880, a little bit higher display density and a little larger screen.
Moto Z Force has a lot bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. Google Pixel 2 XL counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Moto Z Force, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Google Pixel 2 XL also has a higher number of cores.
The Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a bit longer battery duration than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a 3520mAh battery size. The Motorola Moto Z Force features just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Moto Z Force also has a way better resolution back facing camera.
Google Pixel 2 XL is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.