Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2017-10-19 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black and White | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 152.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 537 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.52 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 XL is a little bit better than Moto Z2 Force Edition, with an 82.5 score against 77.4. Even being the best in this comparison, Google Pixel 2 XL is a much thicker and heavier cellphone than the Moto Z2 Force Edition. The Google Pixel 2 XL and the Moto Z2 Force Edition both have incredibly similar screens, although the Moto Z2 Force Edition has a little lower 1440 x 2560 resolution, a little bit worse pixel amount in each screen inch and a little bit smaller screen.
Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition features a bit better processor than Google Pixel 2 XL. Both have a 4 GB RAM and 8 processing cores. Google Pixel 2 XL features just a bit better camera than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rates, the Google Pixel 2 XL also has a higher 12.2 MP resolution back-facing camera, a larger camera sensor and a larger aperture to capture better low light captures and videos.
The Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a way bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Google Pixel 2 XL has improved battery duration than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 29 percent larger battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 2 XL is not only the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.