Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.5 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| 2017-10-19 | 2019-08-16 |
| 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black and White | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 152.00 | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2880 x 1440 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 537 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.52 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 XL has a score of 82.5, which is slightly better than the Motorola One Action's 78.5 global score. Google Pixel 2 XL's body is a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner than Motorola One Action, even though it was released about a year before. The Google Pixel 2 XL features just a bit better display than Motorola One Action, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels and a just a little more pixels per display inch.
The Motorola One Action counts with a lot bigger memory to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Motorola One Action also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The Google Pixel 2 XL features just a bit better processing power than Motorola One Action. Both of them have 4 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core CPU.
Google Pixel 2 XL captures clearer photos and videos than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same aperture, the Google Pixel 2 XL also has a higher 12.2 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera. The Google Pixel 2 XL counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola One Action, because it has a 3520mAh battery size.
Google Pixel 2 XL not only is the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.